Constituencies and Elections
County Kerry
CO. KERRY – 92%, [75,000] c. 1,000, [c. 5,000 (1815)] |
|||
BOROUGH |
TYPE |
PATRON |
ELECTORATE |
Ardfert |
Corporation |
Earl of Glandore |
12 burgesses and 6 freemen |
Dingle |
Corporation |
Maurice FitzGerald heirs – |
150 freemen, 2 resident |
Townshend family |
|||
Tralee |
Corporation |
Sir Barry Denny |
13 burgesses (unchanged 1800–32) |
Co. Kerry - Constituency
The principal interest in Co. Kerry was Lord Kenmare – the largest landowner but a Roman Catholic. Lord Landsdowne (Shelburne) and the Herbert interest were other absentee interests not fully exerted, although used from time to time. The Earl of Kerry’s interest appears to have been joined with the Crosbies, later Earls of Glandore. The four principal interests were the Crosbies, the Blennerhassets, the Fitzgeralds and the Dennys, and they returned the MPs for most of the century. There were other interests, such as the Batemans and by the 1790s the Mullins, who had been present from the beginning of the century, but had expanded their estates around Burnham.
In 1727 a short-lived attempt was made to divide the county between the Crosbies, Dennys and Blennerhassets. The county representation was to be rotated between them and the third participant was to be returned for Ardfert in the case of Crosbie and for Tralee in the case of the other two. Upon the death of one of the original participants his rights were to be transferred to his heir, and ‘All the said three persons do earnestly recommend to their respective families the substance of the foregoing friendly agreement.’
In August 1742 the death of Colonel Arthur Denny without issue dissolved the compact and the ties between him and his brother-in-law, the Earl of Kerry, who then turned to his other brother-in-law, Sir Maurice Crosbie, while the Blennerhassets used the opportunity to try to overturn the Denny interest in Tralee. The boroughs of Ardfert and Tralee were also involved in this compact and its break-up.
Throughout the century Kerry was, despite its apparently orderly pattern of returns, ‘harrassed by electioneering divisions’: these led not only to broken compacts but to duels, suspected murder and even suicide. In April 1794 Sir Barry Denny died and was succeeded by his son and namesake, then in July John Blennerhassett died aged 24. At the ensuing by-election John Gustavus Crosbie of Tubrid (supported by the Blennerhasset family) and Colonel Henry Arthur Herbert, brother-in-law to Lord Glandore, were both candidates. Crosbie took offence at a remark of Sir Barry Denny, the sitting member, and challenged him to a duel; Sir Barry was shot dead.
Then in 1797 Crosbie was killed by a fall from his horse while riding home one night, an incident attributed to the appearance of Sir Barry’s ghost or to Denny poison. Meanwhile, Sir Barry’s father-in-law, who had undertaken the management of his son-in-law’s estate, committed suicide in November 1794, leaving his affairs in disorder. Crosbie Morgell (1488), who sat for the Denny borough of Tralee, was reputed to be a ‘not over scrupulous solicitor’.
By 1800 it has been calculated that there were at least 15 landowners with rent-rolls of over £9,000, and these would all have benefited from the 1793 Catholic enfranchisement. Nevertheless, Crosbies, Fitzgeralds and Herberts continued to represent the county. Its electorate probably rose from about a thousand before 1793 to five thousand in 1815.
-
ID County Year Type Ref.
No.Name 1 Co.
Kerry1692 Election 619 Edward
Denny2 Co.
Kerry1692 Election 753 Thomas
Fitzmaurice3 Co.
Kerry1695 Election 619 Edward
Denny4 Co.
Kerry1695 Election 753 Thomas
Fitzmaurice5 Co.
Kerry1697 By
Election1863 William
Sandes6 Co.
Kerry1703 Election 621 Edward
Denny7 Co.
Kerry1703 Election 166 John
Blennerhassett8 Co.
Kerry1709 By
Election167 (Thomas
Crosbie (0538) n.d.e.) John Blennerhassett9 Co.
Kerry1713 Election 621 Edward
Denny10 Co.
Kerry1713 Election 537 Sir
Maurice Crosbie11 Co.
Kerry1715 Election 167 John
Blennerhassett12 Co.
Kerry1715 Election 537 Sir
Maurice Crosbie13 Co.
Kerry1727 Election 615 Arthur
Denny14 Co.
Kerry1727 Election 537 Sir
Maurice Crosbie15 Co.
Kerry1743 By
Election752 John
(Petty) Fitzmaurice16 Co.
Kerry1751 By
Election168 John
Blennerhassett17 Co.
Kerry1759 By
Election536 Lancelot
Crosbie18 Co.
Kerry1761 Election 1673 William
Petty(-Fitzmaurice) (Lord Fitzmaurice)19 Co.
Kerry1761 Election 167 John
Blennerhassett20 Co.
Kerry1762 By
Election168 John
Blennerhassett21 Co.
Kerry1763 By
Election754 Thomas
Fitzmaurice22 Co.
Kerry1768 Election 617 Sir
Barry Denny23 Co.
Kerry1768 Election 167 John
Blennerhassett24 Co.
Kerry1775 By
Election164 Arthur
Blennerhassett25 Co.
Kerry1776 Election 100 Rowland
Bateman26 Co.
Kerry1776 Election 164 Arthur
Blennerhassett27 Co.
Kerry1783 Election 617 Sir
Barry Denny28 Co.
Kerry1783 Election 1009 Richard
Townsend Herbert29 Co.
Kerry1790 Election 617 Sir
Barry Denny30 Co.
Kerry1790 Election 169 John
Blennerhassett31 Co.
Kerry1794 By
Election618 Sir
Barry Denny (July–Oct. 1794)32 Co.
Kerry1794 By
Election535 John
Gustavus Crosbie33 Co.
Kerry1795 By
Election739 Maurice
Fitzgerald (Kt of Kerry)34 Co.
Kerry1797 Election 739 Maurice
Fitzgerald (Kt of Kerry)35 Co.
Kerry1797 Election 533 James
Crosbie36 Co.
Kerry1801 UK 739 Maurice
Fitzgerald (Kt of Kerry)37 Co.
Kerry1801 UK 533 James
Crosbie38 Co.
Kerry1802 Election 739 Maurice
Fitzgerald (Kt of Kerry)39 Co.
Kerry1802 Election 533 James
Crosbie
Co. Kerry - Boroughs
-
Ardfert was probably a borough by prescription. It had no charter on record, nor is any known to have existed. As early as 1711 Andrew Young of Dublin wrote to David Crosbie at Ardfert saying that he has searched in vain the charters of James I and Charles I and he concludes therefore that the borough exists by prescription. It did, however, return MPs in 1639. Its corporation comprised a portreeve, 12 burgesses and an unlimited number of freemen.
Both Ardfert and Tralee appear to have been almost bargaining counters between the major interests in Co. Kerry. The 1727 compact gives some indication of this, and in 1715 Lord Shelburne wrote to David Crosbie asking him to return Mr Pratt (1721) for ‘one of your boroughs’. This was the famous John Pratt, who produced the financial chaos in the national accounts that Luke Gardiner (0841) was brought in to resolve. Pratt sat for Dingle from 1713 to 1727.
The Crosbies, Earls of Glandore, were notoriously short of money. Furthermore, Lady Glandore (the daughter of Lord George Sackville (1835)) was fond of gambling, and in 1790 a political commentator wrote that:
Since the present noble Lord succeeded his father, it [Ardfert] has regularly been exposed to sale and, notwithstanding that his Lordship has lately been appointed to a considerable office [Joint Master of the Rolls] … it will most probably, still continue a merchantable commodity, ready for the purchasers of parliamentary importance. Peers sometimes want money and according to the present market price, the sale of a borough brings in a sure £500 p.a.
In 1787 Robert Day (0598) warned Crosbie that he must retrench and put his finances in order, so that he would be spared his present hand-to-mouth shifts like the sale of seats: ‘a resource which, by the bye, you are no longer to look to’. However, Crosbie returned Day from 1790 to 1798, when Day, a safe pair of hands, was elevated to the Bench. Glandore, an enthusiastic Unionist, received the £15,000 compensation for Ardfert’s disfranchisement at the Union.